Case Number: 2021-004845


Client seeks assistance with a consumer fraud claim concerning the purchase of a 2013 Nissan Maxima on November 5. 2020 from opposing party (OP). Client states he paid about $2,510 in cash. He further states OP gave him the temporary placard for registration. However, OP never gave him the final documents required by the DMV to complete the registration process. Client filed a complaint with DMV, which subsequently requested Client appear for a 2nd interview. Client states DMV wrongly believes he only paid half the price of the vehicle, whereas Client states he paid the full purchase price. Client states that DMV informed him that OP claims he can return the vehicle or pay half of what the vehicle is worth. Client simply wants the vehicle registered and title transferred.

Case Number: 2021-002619


Client requests representation to assert a claim for the return of her vehicle. She is 76 years old and took her vehicle to the opposing party’s (OP) auto repair shop in preparation for selling the vehicle. She was originally told that the repairs would cost $2500, and when she asked for a discount, OP dropped the price to $2400. She did not receive a written estimate.
After two weeks at the shop, Client states the manager told her that she needed a new transmission, and that it would cost another $5,000. OP demanded payment of $2500 for repairing the fan belt, brakes, and the shifter. However, Client was under the impression that OP was going to repair the transmission for the $2500 and that the car would be fully operable and ready to sell. She does not want to pay the $2500 or the $5000, and would like to pick up the vehicle. She aims to find a used transmission and have another mechanic install it. OP will not allow her to pick up the vehicle unless she pays the $2500 for the work already completed.
Client already sent a certified demand letter to OP, but OP has not complied. She needs to engage counsel to help her get the vehicle returned.

Case Number: 2021-010461


Client needs assistance with a claim against an auto repair shop. Client brought her 2015 Nissan Sentra in to opposing party’s (OP) repair shop several months ago to replace a transmission. The estimate was 2500, and Client states she made arrangements with OP for partial payments. Client has paid 1700 so far. However, OP has apparently relocated and will not disclose its new location. Client has continued to make monthly car payments but has not had access to the car for over six months. Client would like help locating OP and retrieving her vehicle.

Case Number: 2021-008868


Client owns a mobile home and rents a space at the opposing party’s (OP) mobile home park. Client states that around June-August 2020, she didn’t have any running water and had sewage back-up. This has caused a pest issue in her home and medical problems due to her inability to shower. She filed a complaint with the Nevada Manufactured Housing Division. MHD fined the property manager for negligence and non-compliance. Client would like assistance to negotiate withheld rent for those three months.

Client also agreed to work for OP during this time in lieu of rent. She would like counsel and advice and/or limited scope representation regarding unpaid wages, rent arrears and assistance in negotiating a resolution with landlord.

Case Number: 2020-005790


Applicant is 65 years old, income qualified, receives $865 a month from SSDI. She’s seeking her options against adverse. She was awarded a home in a divorce in 2015 without a mortgage. In January 2020, she was diagnosed with kidney disease. During that time she was contacted by a real estate broker and entered into an agreement to sell her home to him through seller financing for $288k which was about $112k below market value. After the close of escrow, in June 2020, he convinced her to sign a loan modification agreement (without consideration) lowering the note’s principal balance from 273k to 223k and extending the due date from August 8th, 2002 to a 30 year note with monthly payment. The purchaser convinced her to sign a subordination agreement allowing him to take a $200k loan which is now in a first position above her loan. At this point, she has received $15k and has a 30 year note in a second position.

Case Number: 2021-001588


Client seeks assistance with a dispute over a security deposit. Client states she attended a virtual tour of an apartment unit with opposing party (OP). She made an online payment of $300 to hold the apartment and $50 for background check. She then signed a one year lease agreement online. She made a security deposit of $400 and first month pro-rated rent of $520.26. After payments, she was directed to pick up the keys and inspect the apartment.
Client states that when she appeared for the inspection, she witnesses OP attempting to repair the balcony area, which had uneven and unstable floor boards and stains from pet feces. Client did not feel comfortable moving into the apartment. She notified management in writing about the habitability issues pursuant to NRS 118A.280: Delivery of Possession of Premises.
Client states the $300 online payment was returned, but OP also provided an early lease termination agreement and a final move-out statement with a balance of $2,722.32 for early lease termination. Client disputes the fee and seeks her security deposit and first month’s rent.