After respondent filed a complaint for custody of the parties’ minor child, appellant filed a counterclaim for divorce. Alternatively, appellant sought to establish that she was respondent’s putative spouse based on the parties’ participation in a religious ceremony called a Nikah. Appellant asserted that both parties believed they were married after the ceremony. Respondent countered that the Nikah was a ceremony only and both parties were aware that it did not result in a legally binding marriage. The district court concluded that they putative spouse doctrine did not apply because both parties consciously and jointly decided not to take the steps necessary to perform a legally recognizable marriage. On appeal, appellant challenges the district court’s characterization of the parties’ relationship.
Case Interest Form
Are you interested in this case? If so please fill out the form below